Health Care Professionals’ Perspectives Before and After Use of eDialogue for Team-Based Digital Communication Across Settings: Qualitative Study

Lili Worre Høpfner Jensen*, Ole Rahbek, Rikke Emilie Kildahl Lauritsen, Søren Vedding Kold, Birthe Dinesen

*Kontaktforfatter

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

8 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Orthopedic surgical treatment is a transversal task that requires the active involvement of patients, relatives, and health care professionals (HCPs) across various settings. However, after hospital discharge, communication is challenged and undertaken primarily by phone. New digital communication solutions have the potential to create a space for seamless and patient-centered dialogue across discipline and sector boundaries. When evaluating new communication solutions, knowledge about HCPs' needs and perspectives of use must be explored, as it is they who are responsible for implementing changes in practice.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to (1) investigate HCPs' perceptions of current communication pathways (phase 1) and (2) explore their experiences of using a simple messenger-like solution (eDialogue) for team-based digital communication across settings (phase 2).

METHODS: We used a triangulation of qualitative data collection techniques, including document analysis, observations, focus groups, and individual interviews of HCPs before (n=28) and after (n=12) their use of eDialogue. Data collection and analysis were inspired by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to specifically understand facilitators and barriers to implementation as perceived by HCPs.

RESULTS: HCPs perceive current communication pathways as insufficient for both patients and themselves. Phone calls are disruptive, and there is a lack of direct communication modalities when communication crosses sector boundaries. HCPs experienced the use of eDialogue as a quick and easy way for timely interdisciplinary interaction with patients and other HCPs across settings; however, concerns were raised about time consumption.

CONCLUSIONS: eDialogue can provide needed support for interdisciplinary and cross-sectoral patient-centered communication. However, future studies of this solution should address its impact and the use of resources.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummere53391
TidsskriftJMIR Human Factors
Vol/bind11
Udgave nummer1
Antal sider13
ISSN2292-9495
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 8 mar. 2024

Bibliografisk note

©Lili Worre Høpfner Jensen, Ole Rahbek, Rikke Emilie Kildahl Lauritsen, Søren Kold, Birthe Dinesen. Originally published in JMIR Human Factors (https://humanfactors.jmir.org), 08.03.2024.

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Health Care Professionals’ Perspectives Before and After Use of eDialogue for Team-Based Digital Communication Across Settings: Qualitative Study'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater